Logca e Metafisica. Atti del Convegno. Palermo, 27-29 marzo 2007

Research output: Contribution to conferenceOther

Abstract

[automatically translated] This volume contains the proceedings of the International Conference "Logic and Metaphysics" (Palermo, 27 to 29 March 2007). The relationship between logic and metaphysics asked presenters to address both from the logic perspective is from the metaphysical aporia of its foundation. The contributions published a critical challenge on the one hand the proliferation of logic ready to invade or judge the reference field and the theses of the same metaphysical, the other the vagueness and silences of metaphysics, often disdainfully closed in on itself. If already at the conference it seemed quite easy to find answers geared to commemorate ap-worth a glorious past relationships or to see the second a comfortable and well-established thesis the absence of reports, interventions and results pushed and push the hard way, but some-mind still not precluded despite the excess of words and silences that threaten to make de-Sueta the question itself, a comparison or criticism synopsis. Introducing The spool and synkrisis aims to recall the conditions sufficient to justify the act of putting in relation logic and metaphysics and, proposing the Platonic image of the cop, tries to represent the diacritical function between logic and metaphysics. But the report, pla-toned memory, including nomoteta and dialectic can not serve as the relationship between logic and metaphysics method of understanding, given that secularism of thinking forces the nomoteta, dialectical and even logical thinking its report to the metaphysics. The expectation of philosophical answers to metaphysical questions by the layman ahead for the logical the need to raise the question of the logical basis of metaphysics. In fact, it has remained implicit in contemporary philosophy still an assumption that ultimate concerns the generalized-tion of the question 'if the truth is ineffable' and that leads to the contemporary aporia on the nature or essence of the logic of language and calculation. If it seems necessary to consider at least two directions to discuss the relationship between logic and me-tafisica, the historical and the critical-theoretical, appropriately the volume presents some loci fe-condition in the history of logic and the history of metaphysics that enable the reader try-tive of a contemporary synkrisis, in very critical way on this side of each scholasticism and specialty closure, on the fundamental quaestio de veritate because the truth is the middle term between logic and metaphysics. But the problem for the truth involves and is a sign of the ineffability of every possible semantic problem: logic and metaphysics appear then involved in a cross-reference in reference to a chin-tertium to serve as a diacritical instrument between them. This already shows the first contribution of Gabriel Sandu, who, starting from the conception universa-list of logic and language proposed by Frege and pursued by Russell and Wittgenstein, offers, to overcome the inexistence of a meta-theory to discuss metaproperty of evils for-systems as well as the inexistence of a metalanguage to discuss the semantics of a given lan-guage, beyond the negative results of the attempt to Tarski, in continuity with Hintikka, the introduction of new richer formal languages of ordinary quantificazionali languages because they are able to express dependencies and independence of quantifiers, so-called IF-languages. The book contains, after the introduction of Joseph Roccaro of the shuttle and synkrisis, eighteen contributions,
Original languageItalian
Pages1-314
Number of pages314
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Cite this