“Le vol d’Icare” d’un genre à l’autre. Esquisse sur la fausseté générique

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[automatically translated] "Instance which ensures the comprehensibility of the text from the perspective of its composition and the content" gender is one of the preliminary knowledge that precede the aesthetic experience and contribute to the orientation of the critical judgment of the reader. It is the notion of jaussienne horizon of expectation that highlights compared to the classic Aristotelian interpretation, a different approach to the genre theory: gender is perceived not only as a text category but as a category of the reception. The kind becomes an intrinsic necessity which must ensure the fulfillment of the reception as "any work implies the horizon of expectation, that is to say a set of existing rules to guide the reader's understanding (of public) and allow him an appreciative reception. " Abandoning his role timeless class, gender becomes, as Jauss remark, a social and historical convention. Jean-Marie Schaeffer introducing the concept of generic manages to intertwine the Aristotelian conception especially on the text to the new feature is finalizing the identification of a kind in its aesthetic reception. Jean-Marie Schaeffer and notices two regimes generic that solve the dialectic between text and its reception: [...] the lectorial regime generics, before responding to a classificatory concern is present in every act of reception, as any reception involves interpretation and that the latter can not be done outside of a generic horizon. The horizon of expectation is of course often linked to a particular hegemonic generic classification. Gold, as generally generic classifications are based on literary canons, often very selective, the gap between the authorial generic status of a text and its lectoriale situation can be very large. The notion of gender "pure category of reading", as distinguished in the generic "productive factor in the constitution of textuality" without forcing a normative inertia text that, while lying in the line of relatives texts him, "is never simple reduplication of the generic model." This dynamism is, as noted Julia Kristeva, the distinctive feature of the novel, considered a 'process', "something that is" difficult to reduce to a static generic codification. Generic dynamism reflects indeed all antipuristes processes that support the idea of a generic coexistence synthesized by the most diverse expressions ranging from peaceful concept of mixing genres, from Derrida's participation without belonging to the annihilation of kind of concept proposed by Rancière: "the novel is the kind of which is no kind, not even a genre as low comedy to which we want to assimilate, because comedy suitable to vulgar topics of the types of situations and forms of expression that suit them. The novel, it is devoid of any principle of ownership. " We must start from reflection Rancière to understand the process that requires Queneau's novel. work written in two genres border The flight of Icarus synthesizes a new approach to the genre theory. The hybridization method which becomes the distinctive mark connatural and in any literary and allows to recognize in u
Original languageFrench
Number of pages0
JournalTRANS
Volume7
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Cite this