L’adattamento italiano del Group Questionnaire (GQ): risultati preliminari in gruppi di training universitario.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceOther

Abstract

[automatically translated] The understanding of the clinical and therapeutic process in the groups, the conceptual elaboration on the constructs of the therapeutic relationship, the investigation into the conceptual overlap (and statistics) constructs Climate Group, Alliance cohesion and are the basis of the proposal of the Group Questionnaire - GQ ( Burlingame, McClendon, Alonso, 2011), 30-item self-report, which provides information on the quality of group relations. The Group Questionnaire - GQ differs from the instruments previously used because it is based on a unified theory of group report (Johnson et al, 2005, 2008, Bormann and Strauss, 2007; Bakali et al, 2008), which identifies a three-factor model: positive link, positive and negative relationship work capacity. It also provides specific information on how the group reports (member-member, member-leader and member-group) are relatively strong or weak. They will present the Italian GQ adaptation of the preliminary results, administered to 100 subjects who participated in the elaboration of professional identity groups, organized within the educational training for students of the Master of Science in Clinical Psychology (5 groups, lasting 8 meetings). two surveys (3:06 meeting) were considered. Together with GQ were administered CALPAS_G (Alliance) and GMLCS_G (cohesion). It will evaluate the convergent validity and internal consistency of GQ. organized within the educational training for students of the Master of Science in Clinical Psychology (5 groups, lasting 8 meetings). two surveys (3:06 meeting) were considered. Together with GQ were administered CALPAS_G (Alliance) and GMLCS_G (cohesion). It will evaluate the convergent validity and internal consistency of GQ. organized within the educational training for students of the Master of Science in Clinical Psychology (5 groups, lasting 8 meetings). two surveys (3:06 meeting) were considered. Together with GQ were administered CALPAS_G (Alliance) and GMLCS_G (cohesion). It will evaluate the convergent validity and internal consistency of GQ.
Original languageItalian
Pages63-63
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this