La parenesi bellica nella storiografia greca: prassi allocutiva e procedure compositive

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    [automatically translated] The article analyzes the main issues relating to exhortations to the soldiers, especially in relation to the practical modalities of communication and the practice of re-processing of texts in ancient historiographical works. Through the analysis of some notations of sources about the realistic indications of speech to the troops, to the theme of phobos widespread in the armies and the specific skills required of army commanders, come forward a few observations that come to positions in part different from those of Mogens Herman Hansen, though not entirely opposite. The Danish scholar believes that most of parenetici speeches is to be considered pure construction, although authoritative, of the ancients for the excessive length and complexity of the periods, they could not be heard by the entire army deployed in the ancient treatises and there would be no mention of the kind of battle exhortation. In this regard, they will be considered a piece of rhetoric in which Aristotle seems to theorize the very model of war parenesis and oration Timoleon dating back to Timaeus the text of which seems very close to what could be the reality of military practice. The article analyzes the main subjects of the ancient battle exhortations, especially the ways of communication and the practice of text's reprocessing in the Greek historiography. Throughout the analysis of some fonts about the realistic suggestions of soldier's keynote, as well as the popular theme of phobos in the army and the specific skills required to the commanders, That we get to some observations come from different opinions, but not so far from Mogens Herman Hansen's point of view. The Dutch scholar thinks That most of the battle exhortations are in ancient fictitious reconstruction: the complexity and length of the sentences, in fact, could not be heard from soldiers in the field and furthermore in rhetorical theory there is not any sign of the battle exhortation. For this reason it will be Analyzed a text of Aristotle's Rhetorica, in cui the Author Seems To theorize the pattern of battle exhortation, and a speech of Timoleon, written by Timaeus and reported by Polybius, Whose text Seems to be very close to the real military practices. Battle exhortation The Dutch scholar thinks That most of the battle exhortations are in ancient fictitious reconstruction: the complexity and length of the sentences, in fact, could not be heard from soldiers in the field and furthermore in rhetorical theory there is not any sign of the battle exhortation. For this reason it will be Analyzed a text of Aristotle's Rhetorica, in cui the Author Seems To theorize the pattern of battle exhortation, and a speech of Timoleon, written by Timaeus and reported by Polybius, Whose text Seems to be very close to the real military practices. Battle exhortation The Dutch scholar thinks That most of the battle exhortations are in ancient fictitious reconstruction: the complexity and length of the sentences, in fact, could not be heard from soldiers in the field and furthermore in rhetorical theory there is not any sign of the battle exhortation. For this reason it will be Analyzed a text of Aristotle's Rhetorica, in cui the Author Seems To theorize the pattern of battle exhortation, and a speech of Timoleon, written by Timaeus and reported by Polybius, Whose text Seems to be very close to the real military practices. Battle exhortation in cui the Author Seems To theorize the pattern of battle exhortation, and a speech of Timoleon, written by Timaeus and reported by Polybius, Whose tex
    Original languageItalian
    Pages (from-to)17-37
    Number of pages21
    JournalHORMOS
    Volumen.s. 2
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Cite this