From laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy to vaginal assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy

Vito Chiantera, Christardt Koehler, Elisabeth Gottschalk, Achim Schneider, Kati Hasenbein, Vito Chiantera, Simone Marnitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard surgical treatment for patients with early stage cervical cancer. The majority of radical hysterectomies are performed with the open technique. However, laparoscopic, combined laparoscopic and vaginal, and robotic-assisted approaches may also be used. Compared with the abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), laparoscopic techniques are associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, better cosmesis, and faster recovery. A further breakthrough in laparoscopic technique can only be made if safety and oncological clearance are comparable with ARH. We describe the technique and results of laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and the transition to vaginal assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. © 2011 RCOG.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254-262
Number of pages9
JournalBJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
Volume119
Publication statusPublished - 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'From laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy to vaginal assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this