Environmental modelling of aluminium based components manufacturing routes: Additive manufacturing versus machining versus forming

Giuseppe Ingarao, Paolo C. Priarone, Dimos Paraskevas, Yelin Deng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing represents, by now, a viable alternative for metal-based components production. Therefore the designer, often, has to select among three options at process design stage: subtractive, mass conserving, and additive approaches. The selection of a given process, besides affecting the manufacturing step impact, influences significantly the impact related to the material production step. If the process enables a part weight reduction (as the Additive Manufacturing approaches do) even the use phase is affected by the manufacturing approach selection. The present research provides a comprehensive environmental manufacturing approaches comparison for components made of aluminum alloys. Additive manufacturing (Selective Laser Sintering), machining, and forming processes are analyzed and compared by means of Life Cycle Assessment techniques. The effect of weight reduction enabled by additive approach is considered. The paper aims at highlighting the strong link between manufacturing approach selection and material use. In this respect, a thorough environmental analysis of the pre-manufacturing step is developed. Moreover, the influence of eco-attributes aluminium variability on the comparative analysis results is studied. The paper, therefore, contributes to the development of a methodology for manufacturing approaches comparison, providing guidelines for green manufacturing approach selection. Results reveal that, for the analyzed case studies, the Additive Manufacturing is a sustainable solution for aluminium components only under a specific scenario: high complexity shapes, significant weight reduction, and application in transportation systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-275
Number of pages15
JournalJOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume176
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

3D printers
environmental modeling
Machining
manufacturing
aluminum
Aluminum
Manufacturing
Modeling
Life cycle
Aluminum alloys
Process design
Sintering
transportation system
Lasers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Environmental modelling of aluminium based components manufacturing routes: Additive manufacturing versus machining versus forming. / Ingarao, Giuseppe; Priarone, Paolo C.; Paraskevas, Dimos; Deng, Yelin.

In: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, Vol. 176, 2018, p. 261-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3fb38651ea7949c2ac78a1eb5ab08462,
title = "Environmental modelling of aluminium based components manufacturing routes: Additive manufacturing versus machining versus forming",
abstract = "Additive Manufacturing represents, by now, a viable alternative for metal-based components production. Therefore the designer, often, has to select among three options at process design stage: subtractive, mass conserving, and additive approaches. The selection of a given process, besides affecting the manufacturing step impact, influences significantly the impact related to the material production step. If the process enables a part weight reduction (as the Additive Manufacturing approaches do) even the use phase is affected by the manufacturing approach selection. The present research provides a comprehensive environmental manufacturing approaches comparison for components made of aluminum alloys. Additive manufacturing (Selective Laser Sintering), machining, and forming processes are analyzed and compared by means of Life Cycle Assessment techniques. The effect of weight reduction enabled by additive approach is considered. The paper aims at highlighting the strong link between manufacturing approach selection and material use. In this respect, a thorough environmental analysis of the pre-manufacturing step is developed. Moreover, the influence of eco-attributes aluminium variability on the comparative analysis results is studied. The paper, therefore, contributes to the development of a methodology for manufacturing approaches comparison, providing guidelines for green manufacturing approach selection. Results reveal that, for the analyzed case studies, the Additive Manufacturing is a sustainable solution for aluminium components only under a specific scenario: high complexity shapes, significant weight reduction, and application in transportation systems.",
keywords = "Additive manufacturing, Decision support tool, Environmental impact comparison, Forming, Machining, Sustainable manufacturing",
author = "Giuseppe Ingarao and Priarone, {Paolo C.} and Dimos Paraskevas and Yelin Deng",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "176",
pages = "261--275",
journal = "JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION",
issn = "0959-6526",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental modelling of aluminium based components manufacturing routes: Additive manufacturing versus machining versus forming

AU - Ingarao, Giuseppe

AU - Priarone, Paolo C.

AU - Paraskevas, Dimos

AU - Deng, Yelin

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Additive Manufacturing represents, by now, a viable alternative for metal-based components production. Therefore the designer, often, has to select among three options at process design stage: subtractive, mass conserving, and additive approaches. The selection of a given process, besides affecting the manufacturing step impact, influences significantly the impact related to the material production step. If the process enables a part weight reduction (as the Additive Manufacturing approaches do) even the use phase is affected by the manufacturing approach selection. The present research provides a comprehensive environmental manufacturing approaches comparison for components made of aluminum alloys. Additive manufacturing (Selective Laser Sintering), machining, and forming processes are analyzed and compared by means of Life Cycle Assessment techniques. The effect of weight reduction enabled by additive approach is considered. The paper aims at highlighting the strong link between manufacturing approach selection and material use. In this respect, a thorough environmental analysis of the pre-manufacturing step is developed. Moreover, the influence of eco-attributes aluminium variability on the comparative analysis results is studied. The paper, therefore, contributes to the development of a methodology for manufacturing approaches comparison, providing guidelines for green manufacturing approach selection. Results reveal that, for the analyzed case studies, the Additive Manufacturing is a sustainable solution for aluminium components only under a specific scenario: high complexity shapes, significant weight reduction, and application in transportation systems.

AB - Additive Manufacturing represents, by now, a viable alternative for metal-based components production. Therefore the designer, often, has to select among three options at process design stage: subtractive, mass conserving, and additive approaches. The selection of a given process, besides affecting the manufacturing step impact, influences significantly the impact related to the material production step. If the process enables a part weight reduction (as the Additive Manufacturing approaches do) even the use phase is affected by the manufacturing approach selection. The present research provides a comprehensive environmental manufacturing approaches comparison for components made of aluminum alloys. Additive manufacturing (Selective Laser Sintering), machining, and forming processes are analyzed and compared by means of Life Cycle Assessment techniques. The effect of weight reduction enabled by additive approach is considered. The paper aims at highlighting the strong link between manufacturing approach selection and material use. In this respect, a thorough environmental analysis of the pre-manufacturing step is developed. Moreover, the influence of eco-attributes aluminium variability on the comparative analysis results is studied. The paper, therefore, contributes to the development of a methodology for manufacturing approaches comparison, providing guidelines for green manufacturing approach selection. Results reveal that, for the analyzed case studies, the Additive Manufacturing is a sustainable solution for aluminium components only under a specific scenario: high complexity shapes, significant weight reduction, and application in transportation systems.

KW - Additive manufacturing

KW - Decision support tool

KW - Environmental impact comparison

KW - Forming

KW - Machining

KW - Sustainable manufacturing

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/281758

M3 - Article

VL - 176

SP - 261

EP - 275

JO - JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION

JF - JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION

SN - 0959-6526

ER -