Decisional procrastination in academic settings: The role of metacognitions and learning strategies

Silvana Miceli, Maria Sinatra, Lucia Monacis, Valeria De Palo, Santo Di Nuovo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nowadays, university students suffer from a broad range of problems, such as educational underachievement or the inability to control themselves, that lead to procrastination as a consequence. The present research aimed at analyzing the determinants of decisional procrastination among undergraduate students and at assessing a path model in which self regulated learning strategies mediated the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination. 273 students from Southern Italy filled out a questionnaire composed by: the socio-demographic section, the Metacognitive Beliefs About Procrastination Questionnaire, the procrastination subscale of the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire, and the Anxiety, the Time Management, and the Information Processing subscales of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Results showed that the relationship between negative and positive metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination was mediated only by time management and anxiety. Such findings underlined the crucial role played by learning strategies in predicting the tendency to delay decisional situations and in mediating the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume8
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Learning
Time Management
Students
Anxiety
Underachievement
Automatic Data Processing
Italy
Decision Making
Demography
Equipment and Supplies
Metacognition
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Decisional procrastination in academic settings: The role of metacognitions and learning strategies. / Miceli, Silvana; Sinatra, Maria; Monacis, Lucia; De Palo, Valeria; Di Nuovo, Santo.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8, 2017, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miceli, Silvana ; Sinatra, Maria ; Monacis, Lucia ; De Palo, Valeria ; Di Nuovo, Santo. / Decisional procrastination in academic settings: The role of metacognitions and learning strategies. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 8. pp. 1-8.
@article{d520abb7bbad4172babb6e4e36da38da,
title = "Decisional procrastination in academic settings: The role of metacognitions and learning strategies",
abstract = "Nowadays, university students suffer from a broad range of problems, such as educational underachievement or the inability to control themselves, that lead to procrastination as a consequence. The present research aimed at analyzing the determinants of decisional procrastination among undergraduate students and at assessing a path model in which self regulated learning strategies mediated the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination. 273 students from Southern Italy filled out a questionnaire composed by: the socio-demographic section, the Metacognitive Beliefs About Procrastination Questionnaire, the procrastination subscale of the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire, and the Anxiety, the Time Management, and the Information Processing subscales of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Results showed that the relationship between negative and positive metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination was mediated only by time management and anxiety. Such findings underlined the crucial role played by learning strategies in predicting the tendency to delay decisional situations and in mediating the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination.",
author = "Silvana Miceli and Maria Sinatra and Lucia Monacis and {De Palo}, Valeria and {Di Nuovo}, Santo",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decisional procrastination in academic settings: The role of metacognitions and learning strategies

AU - Miceli, Silvana

AU - Sinatra, Maria

AU - Monacis, Lucia

AU - De Palo, Valeria

AU - Di Nuovo, Santo

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Nowadays, university students suffer from a broad range of problems, such as educational underachievement or the inability to control themselves, that lead to procrastination as a consequence. The present research aimed at analyzing the determinants of decisional procrastination among undergraduate students and at assessing a path model in which self regulated learning strategies mediated the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination. 273 students from Southern Italy filled out a questionnaire composed by: the socio-demographic section, the Metacognitive Beliefs About Procrastination Questionnaire, the procrastination subscale of the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire, and the Anxiety, the Time Management, and the Information Processing subscales of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Results showed that the relationship between negative and positive metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination was mediated only by time management and anxiety. Such findings underlined the crucial role played by learning strategies in predicting the tendency to delay decisional situations and in mediating the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination.

AB - Nowadays, university students suffer from a broad range of problems, such as educational underachievement or the inability to control themselves, that lead to procrastination as a consequence. The present research aimed at analyzing the determinants of decisional procrastination among undergraduate students and at assessing a path model in which self regulated learning strategies mediated the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination. 273 students from Southern Italy filled out a questionnaire composed by: the socio-demographic section, the Metacognitive Beliefs About Procrastination Questionnaire, the procrastination subscale of the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire, and the Anxiety, the Time Management, and the Information Processing subscales of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Results showed that the relationship between negative and positive metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination was mediated only by time management and anxiety. Such findings underlined the crucial role played by learning strategies in predicting the tendency to delay decisional situations and in mediating the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/234659

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

ER -