Accordo e disaccordo: prospettive logico-retoriche

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[automatically translated] For more than 50 years argumentation theory has acquired a central role in the philosophical and linguistic reflection. As of 1958, the year they leave simultaneously but in a totally independent, the Treaty of argumentation Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca and The argument uses of S. Toulmin, there has, in fact, to a lock revaluation a logic of the argument that, as opposed to demonstrative logic Cartesian, recovers the centrality of notions of effectiveness, probably, the audience. Doxastic a logical, therefore, that, to use the terminology employed by Aristotle, applies to that which, being true or false, can be otherwise than it is. It is, in hindsight,
Original languageItalian
Number of pages0
JournalRIVISTA ITALIANA DI FILOSOFIA DEL LINGUAGGIO
Volume6
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this